👋 I am disabling input while I build a new version that does not rely on Twitter's $100 / mo API.

Google Classroom Practice Sets: Too Good to be True?

Questions remain about whether Google Classroom's new practice sets will truly benefit students or just create additional disparities between those with access and those without access to such technology

A blackboard with "Google Classroom Practice Sets" written on it in chalk surrounded by question marks indicating uncertainty about their efficacy

A blackboard with "Google Classroom Practice Sets" written on it in chalk surrounded by question marks indicating uncertainty about their efficacy

The latest development in educational technology is causing a stir among educators and students alike. Google Classroom has recently released practice sets, which are interactive assignments that provide instant feedback and real-time support for students who are stuck solving problems. These practice sets are made possible by adaptive learning technology, but many are wondering if this new development is too good to be true. While the idea of providing immediate feedback and support for struggling students is an attractive one, there have been some concerns raised about the efficacy of these practice sets. Some experts worry that the technology may not be sophisticated enough to accurately assess student performance or offer meaningful guidance. Additionally, there is concern that these practice sets may not provide enough of a challenge for more advanced learners. Furthermore, there have been questions raised about the cost of using these practice sets in classrooms. While Google Classroom does offer free access to its services, some schools may not have the resources necessary to take advantage of this technology due to budgetary constraints or lack of technological infrastructure. This could lead to an unequal playing field between those schools with access to these tools and those without them. Finally, some worry that this new development could further widen the achievement gap between different groups of students. If teachers rely too heavily on automated assessment tools such as these practice sets, it could limit their ability to tailor instruction according to individual student needs or give personalized attention when needed most. This could lead to poorer outcomes for certain groups of students who need more individualized attention than what can be provided by automated systems like this one. Overall, while Google Classroom's new practice sets certainly seem promising on paper, there remain many unanswered questions about their effectiveness and potential drawbacks that must be addressed before they can become widely adopted in classrooms across the country.