Double Standard on Election Vulnerabilities
After the 2016 election left-leaning groups were allowed to discuss voting machine vulnerabilities while after the 2020 election right-leaning groups faced bans from social media platforms for doing so raising questions about fairness going forward into future elections
Dec. 30, 2022 1:24PM
Generated in 22.7 seconds
A black and white image featuring two hands shaking with one hand representing left-leaning politics and one hand representing right-leaning politics with text reading "Double Standard on Election Vulnerabilities" above them
In the wake of the 2020 election, a double standard has been exposed when it comes to discussing voting machine vulnerabilities. After the 2016 election, left-leaning groups were allowed to discuss these vulnerabilities openly and without consequence. However, after the 2020 election, right-leaning groups have been banned from social media platforms for doing exactly that. The implications of this double standard are far reaching and could have an impact on future elections. This is especially concerning as many states across the country use voting machines that are vulnerable to hacking or manipulation. It is unclear why different standards were applied in each instance, but it appears that those who discussed these issues in 2016 were given preferential treatment while those who did so in 2020 faced harsh consequences. The issue has been brought up by several prominent figures on both sides of the aisle including President Donald Trump and Senator Bernie Sanders. Both have called for greater transparency when it comes to discussing voting machine vulnerabilities and ensuring that everyone is treated fairly regardless of their political views. This double standard raises questions about how we can ensure fair elections going forward if certain voices are silenced while others are allowed to speak freely about potential vulnerabilities in our electoral system. It also highlights how social media companies have taken sides in political debates which could lead to further polarization among Americans at a time when unity is desperately needed. Ultimately, it is clear that something needs to be done to ensure fairness when discussing potential vulnerabilities with our voting systems so that all voices can be heard equally without fear of retribution or censorship from social media companies or other entities with an agenda. Until then, this double standard will continue to exist and may even become more pronounced as we move closer towards future elections.