👋 I am disabling input while I build a new version that does not rely on Twitter's $100 / mo API.

Bipartisan Spending Addiction on Full Display in Congress

In a recent House GOP conference meeting, 158 Republican reps voted FOR earmarks - showing that Washington's spending addiction is indeed bipartisan problem - and 14 Republican Senators voted AGAINST an amendment that would have stripped earmarks from the omnibus bill this week.

A photo of Capitol Hill at night with a caption reading "Washington's Spending Addiction."

A photo of Capitol Hill at night with a caption reading "Washington's Spending Addiction."

In a House GOP conference meeting last month, 158 Republican representatives voted in favor of earmarks, showing that Washington's spending addiction is a bipartisan problem. The issue was brought to the Senate floor this week when 14 Republican Senators voted against an amendment from Sen. Johnson that would have stripped earmarks from the omnibus. The amendment failed, with 44 Senators voting for it and 56 voting against it. Democrats were largely unified in their opposition to the amendment, while Republicans were split down the middle with 28 voting for and 28 voting against it. Earmarks are special provisions inserted into legislation by individual members of Congress that direct federal funds to specific projects or organizations in their home districts or states. They are controversial because they often lead to wasteful spending and can be used as a form of political patronage. Despite these criticisms, many members of Congress still support them as a way to bring resources back to their constituents and increase local economic development. The vote in the Senate shows how deeply entrenched Washington's spending addiction has become across both parties. It also highlights how difficult it will be for lawmakers to make meaningful progress on reducing government spending without strong bipartisan support for reform measures like eliminating earmarks from legislation altogether.