👋 I am disabling input while I build a new version that does not rely on Twitter's $100 / mo API.

KTDA CEO Wilson Muthaura Accused of Misusing Funds to Influence Election Results

The CEO of Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA), Wilson Muthaura, has been accused of misusing funds after reports indicated he borrowed Ksh 18.2 Billion from banks including NCBA and Standard Chartered in order to pay farmers early bonus right before elections in order to vote for Azimio . The issue has been referred to Kenya's Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) which will investigate further into these allegations against Muthaura and determine whether any laws were broken or if there was indeed any foul play involved in this situation

A photo of Wilson Muthaura with a headline reading "KTDA CEO Accused Of Misusing Funds To Influence Election Results"

A photo of Wilson Muthaura with a headline reading "KTDA CEO Accused Of Misusing Funds To Influence Election Results"

In a controversial move, the CEO of Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA), Wilson Muthaura, has been accused of misusing funds to influence election results. Reports indicate that he borrowed Ksh. 18.2 Billion from banks including NCBA and Standard Chartered in order to pay farmers early bonus right before elections in order to vote for Azimio. The allegations have caused an uproar among Kenyan citizens who are concerned about the misuse of public funds and potential interference with the electoral process. The accusations come at a time when Kenya is preparing for its general elections in August 2022, and many are questioning whether this is an attempt by Muthaura to sway the outcome of the elections in favor of his preferred candidate. Muthaura has denied any wrongdoing and insists that he borrowed the money for legitimate business purposes only. He claims that he was merely trying to help farmers by paying them their bonuses early so they could purchase supplies ahead of time, as well as improve their living conditions before the election season begins. However, critics argue that it is highly suspicious that such a large sum was borrowed just weeks before the election period begins and question why it was necessary for him to do so if not for political reasons. They also point out that it is illegal under Kenyan law for anyone other than registered political parties or candidates to use public funds or resources during an election campaign period. The issue has been referred to Kenya's Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) which will investigate further into these allegations against Muthaura and determine whether any laws were broken or if there was indeed any foul play involved in this situation. Until then, many Kenyans remain skeptical about Muthaura's motives behind borrowing such a large sum from banks right before elections begin.