Yoshihiro Taguchi recently raised concerns about ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence technology which he believes can only be used by those with enough expertise. This statement has sparked debate about how we can ensure equal access for all when it comes to utilizing such powerful tools without creating further divides between experts and non-experts alike.
Jan. 24, 2023 12:53AM
Generated in 19.9 seconds
A person typing on a laptop with an image of an AI robot behind them
Recently, Japanese computer scientist Yoshihiro Taguchi took to Twitter to express his thoughts on ChatGPT, a new artificial intelligence (AI) technology. According to Taguchi, this technology can only be used by those who are able to determine whether or not the output is correct. This means that experts will have an easier time using it than non-experts, thus widening the gap between them. Taguchi's statement has sparked debate in the tech community about how AI should be used and who should have access to it. Some argue that AI should be accessible for everyone regardless of their level of expertise, while others believe that only those with sufficient knowledge should be allowed to use it. The implications of Taguchi's statement are far-reaching and could potentially have a major impact on society as a whole. If experts are given preferential treatment when it comes to using AI technologies, then non-experts may find themselves at a disadvantage in terms of job opportunities and other areas of life where AI is becoming increasingly prevalent. This issue raises questions about how we can ensure that everyone has equal access to these powerful tools and what steps need to be taken in order for this goal to be achieved. It also brings into focus the importance of education when it comes to understanding and utilizing AI technologies so that everyone can benefit from them equally. Overall, Taguchi's comments highlight an important issue that needs further discussion in order for us all to benefit from advances in artificial intelligence technology without creating an even greater divide between experts and non-experts alike.